Some of you may have heard of this individual. He is behind a lot of technical publishing these days. But, as part of an interview, he seems to make a very basic point about education.. See what it says to you. If you ask, I'll tell what it says to me..
Tim O'Reilly on Web 2.0 and Education
"I think we're in--in a lot of ways--a period of the most profound reinvention of ...education and how people need to learn since the invention of literacy."
Tim O'Reilly is the founder of O'Reilly Media, and one of the originators of the phrase "Web 2.0." His essay on Web 2.0 certainly is considered the seminal description.
Tim and I talked about Web 2.0, education, and what the future holds for networked computing. I haven't put this in my "School 2.0" series because, as you'll hear, Tim's take on education isn't nearly as technology-focused as one might expect.
Topics that Tim covers in the interview:
- Being self-taught
- Having a mental model of how the world works to let you figure out what's important
- A new "digital divide" today between those who know how to think about search and those who don't; those who know where the current hot information is being shared, and those who don't.
- Tim's skepticism of formal education, coming from the computer industry and seeing creativity from those with very different backgrounds, with their formal education almost alway not in the area where they have made an impact (himself included).
- Self-learning.
- How most periods of a creative renaissance start with inspired amateurs.
- The importance of "doing things," "tinkering,", and "exploratory learning."
- That "engagement" is not new to Web 2.0, but the opportunity is being democratized by the technology.
- That it is important not to generalize too much about where the technology is headed from the initial formative period.
- How he believes that spending on educational technology is a bad idea (smile!), and that smaller class sizes would make the most difference in education, period, by giving more interaction with passionate adults who have time and ability to focus on kids. (See if you feel comfortable with how I respond to this point.)
- How we need to get rid of unionized seniority to get fresh blood, so the best can rise to the top instead of the most senior. (Again, I'm interested in your responses to this and your take on how I responded.)
- Open Source software, and how Web 2.0 is actually antithetical to open source software.
- Clayton Christiansen's "law of conservation of attractive profits," where value in Web applications moving toward the harnessing and collecting of data and intelligence.
- How it's not free software that we need but free data.
- The inevitability of large companies absorbing the web 2.0 technologies by leveraging their data collection capabilities.
- The biggest change he sees on horizon: collective intelligence based on our being "sensory enabled." "Live Software" that learns from that data.
- What Web 2.0 technologies that he likes
- His final words for educators: "have fun." Share your own enthusiasm, excitement, and passion.
posted by Dad of Many @ 1:50 PM
2 comments
2 Comments:
Okay, I'm asking... what does it say to you? I could probably write a different blog post on every point he makes, but I'm trying not to rant on blogs, so let me play fair by sharing a couple of things.
1) I agree with small class sizes. One of the reasons I moved back to Vermont was to raise my family in an area where certain quality indicators were present (one of those was small class sizes. My kids never had a class size over 20 in K-8 level, and I KNOW that made a difference. (But a caveat, if you are so lucky to have a school in your community with smaller class sizes, also PRESERVE the integrity of the quality time with kids by making sure your teachers have the TIME and COMMITTMENT to your kids. I see many small schools where teachers have to wear so many hats, there really isn't much increased ONE to ONE time with kids.
2) His comments about why having more hands on education is really important resonate to those of us who have taught in a "Career and Technical Education" arena (formerly known as vocational education). Tech education content has changed tremendously in response to changes in workforce development needs. Some of the programs I've taught in have actually used the O'Reilly books and given kids the opportunity to develop skills in problem solving, innovation, and searching for answers!
... You're turn
Biggest thing I saw in this article was the point of taking initiative in your education. This blog is aimed at a group of kids I work with and I am hoping that they realize what a blessing they have in the wealth of info available to them. Between OReilly, or using something as simple as a $30 monthly connection to the Inet, they can get an education from MIT and beyond. But, they have to want it. It's there for the taking. Just as learning to program, writing music, or drawing a masterpiece. The education to do this is available cheap. But, it is up to the individual to put the effort in and to get good at it.
Post a Comment
<< Home